offlinemotorcycle.blogg.se

1. #AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS VS SOPHOS FOR MAC FOR MAC#
2. #AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS VS SOPHOS FOR MAC SOFTWARE#
3. #AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS VS SOPHOS FOR MAC PC#
4. #AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS VS SOPHOS FOR MAC WINDOWS#

Looks like Mac anti-malware is a buyer's market.If you are looking for Mac security application but do not want to spend a lot of money, this article is just right for you because it will reveal the main features and reviews of two free security packages for Macs. You may decide that there's no point in using anything other than the free avast! and Sophos products, but for a few bucks you might see something in one of the others that appeals to you. With all that data it's hard to pick a single product out, except to point out that avast! Free Antivirus and Sophos Anti-Virus are the only free products among those with good results both in detection and system performance and that ESET has several additional features missing in the others.Ĭorrected on September 5: The first version of this story did not mention avast! Free Antivirus as one of the top-performing free products. The only real stand-out is ESET Cyber Security Pro, which offers anti-spam, personal firewall, safe browsing and parental control. Eight of them add no extra features (as counted by AV-TEST).

#AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS VS SOPHOS FOR MAC PC#

AV-TEST says that they observed no meaningful performance degradation with any of the products in normal interaction.Ĭompared to PC products, the Mac products offer very few additional features. Clearly something was very wrong with Trend Micro and this specific operation. With Microworld eScan installed the operation took 40.4 seconds. If you leave out the products from Microworld and Trend Micro, the average of the rest is 18.9 seconds and the high is 20.8, both perfectly acceptable. The test was to copy 7.4GB of files and the reference number (no anti-malware products) was 17.2 seconds. System performance impact has some interesting results. This may be possible because of the relatively low number of samples. None of the products had a single false positive. Trend Micro (33.3%), Webroot (22.6%) and McAfee(21.4%) all stand out in a bad way. Several products, all with well-known brands, had disappointing results. All of these numbers are excellent, but obviously it doesn't get better than 100%.

Kaspersky detected 95.2% on-access, several others detected 97.6% and 98.8% and four products detected 100% of malware on-access. AV-TEST also gives results for on-demand scanning, but their importance pales (in our opinoin) in comparison to those of on-access.

The products from avast!, Bitdefender, G Data, Norman, ESET, Intego, Panda, Microworld, F-Secure, Sophos and Kaspersky detected a very high percentage of the malware on-access. The versions available at the Mac App Store might be limited in functionality, as they cannot access all APIs."ĪV-TEST provides test results for malware detection, both on-access and on-demand false positives impact on system performance and ancillary features, specifically anti-spam, anti-phishing, personal firewall, safe browsing, parental control, backup and encryption. The G Data and Norman products use the Bitdefender engine and the Panda product is based on the Intego product.ĪV-TEST used ".the products which are offered at the AV vendor's websites as downloads. Five of the products (avast!, Sophos, AVG, Comodo and Avira) are free.

You can find complete results on their site.

#AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS VS SOPHOS FOR MAC SOFTWARE#

The existence of quite a few companies in the business of Mac anti-malware software shows that there's enough demand for it too. But there is malware out there for the Mac and it does hit users in the real world, if less often and less intensely than on the PC. For the Mac they identify less than 100 per month.

#AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS VS SOPHOS FOR MAC WINDOWS#

Every day, independent test lab  captures more than 400,000 new malware samples for Windows and 5,000 new samples for Android.